Based on the casebook of Jack The Ripper, Carl Feigenbaum was arrested in 1894 in New York City for cutting the throat of Mrs. Juliana Hoffman. This case make Carl Feigenbaum listed in one of the suspects of Jack the Ripper cases.
I'm as the defender to Carl Feigenbaum believe that Carl Feigenbaum is not Jack The Ripper. He had no proof that he is Jack the Ripper. It is because within the time of the cases, Carl Feigenbaum was not at the Whitechapel. The cases of the Jack the Ripper between 1888 to 1891. At that time, Carl Feigenbaum had travelled around the US and Europe to find a job.
Next, during the moment of the killer, there was a witness. When Carl Feigenbaum had killed Mrs. Hoffman, victim's son had seen the cases. Carl had killed Hoffman in front of Hoffman son without sympathy. So, from the statement it shown that Carl Feigenbaum not Jack The Ripper because in Jack The Ripper cases there was no witness that seen the cases. In Carl cases there was a witness.
Then, the way Carl Feigenbaum killed Hoffman are totally different from Jack The Ripper. Carl killed Hoffman with cutting her throat while Jack the Ripper killed the victims with cutting throat and mutilate their body. Based on the evidence for Jack the Ripper cases it can assume that the murderer was a doctor. It is because the killer knows all the part of organs inside the body. From the statement from Carl's Lawyer, Carl is a seaman so he did not know any part of organs inside human body.
In the nutshells and based on the evidence above it proof that Carl Feigenbaum is not Jack The Ripper.
No comments:
Post a Comment